
I tried to sit in on a chat with J Allard today, through microsoft communities. The lag was unbearable, my chat window rarely updated. (Maybe they should have tried a linux solution.) However, a
transcript of the chat was posted later.
J basically took questions from the hardcore gaming crowd about the upcoming console. Lots of straightforward (surprise!) and sensible answers about various things such as the 2 packages to be offered, memory units, DVD drives, prices, xbox live, etc.
The only answer that smelled funny was this one:
Q: Why do they have the core package? Why doesn’t microsoft just release the package with the Harddrive so developers will be able to fully utilize it?
A: independent of the configurations we have at launch it was imparative that we work with developers now to abstract the storage system because (1) the drive is removable and we want people to play even if the drive is not present (2) another possibility is that 5 years from now that you want more storage on the box or on the network and be able to take advantage of that. by abstracting storage in the system we are making sure that all xbox 360 games will work on all configurations moving forward and early customers will be able to take advantage of future scenarios like bigger drives and network storage.
1) Yeah, I’ll be playing my console a lot after I pull the drive. Huh?
2) Five years from now? The box will be weak, I doubt I’ll be worrying about uprading it or using it as a media server. I think they know that too.
Bill, I mean J, should have just come out and said because they needed a cheaper version for the mainstream public sweet-spot price of under $300, and yanking the HD was the easiet thing to do that made (some) sense.
A couple of other interesting notes:
– No backward compatability with xbox 1 unless your 360 has a hard drive.
– You will be able to stream standard and high definition video from media center PCs.
Still no release date comments other than (I figured) “soon,” but an interesting read.
Chat Transcript